News analysis: What does FTX's crash mean for Temasek Holdings, and should such entities invest in the crypto industry?

SINGAPORE — The fall of crypto exchange FTX last week should be seen as an isolated incident, not as a systemic failure of the industry, and should not deter institutional firms from investing in such outfits, said analysts.

Instead, FTX’s demise, which was shocking to many, should underline how important it is for investors to study the risks they take when they park their money in a lightly regulated industry, they added.

FTX’s collapse has led to a further tumbling in crypto assets such as bitcoin and ethereum, which had already taken a battering earlier in the year.

Noting that an exchange this large has never failed in this manner, Blockchain Association Singapore co-chairman Chia Hock Lai said: “I think it’s an isolated incident and there’s an element of fraud involved.”

Mr Chia added that FTX was one of the largest crypto exchanges in the world, with a high trading volume and institutional investors such as venture capital firm Sequoia Capital and state investment firm Temasek Holdings.

According to Forbes, Temasek has a 1 per cent stake in FTX and the value of its investment at its peak last January was US$320 million (S$439 million).

In response to TODAY’s queries, Temasek said that it had no further comment. It had previously told Reuters that it was aware of the developments between FTX and Binance and was engaging FTX in its capacity as a shareholder.

TODAY takes a look at what the crash of FTX means for Temasek and if it is prudent for such institutional investors to invest in the industry.


FTX, which is headquartered in the Bahamas but managed from the United States, is a cryptocurrency exchange, which means it helps people to buy and sell crypto assets.

FTX had valued its assets at between US$10 billion and US$50 billion, and listed more than 130 affiliated companies around the world, according to its bankruptcy filing.

Last week, FTX sought bankruptcy protection after a rapid series of events that unfolded largely on Twitter which involved FTX attempting to sell a large part of its operating business to rival Binance after customers fled the exchange over fears that the firm may have had insufficient capital.

But just as quickly as Binance offered its rescue package in the form of an acquisition, the company backed out of the deal.

And within only a few days, the multibillion-dollar crypto exchange went from crypto leader to bankrupt. Its chief executive officer and founder also resigned.

Hours later, the trading firm said there had been “unauthorised access” and that funds had disappeared. Analysts say hundreds of millions of dollars may have vanished.

Social media users also debated whether the exchange was hacked or a company insider had stolen funds —  a possibility that analysts did not rule out.

The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) said earlier this week that FTX is neither licensed nor exempted from licensing here amid reports that many Singaporeans had invested in the beleaguered firm and are now at risk of losing their money.

Among the questions that have been raised since the FTX collapse is why MAS had not made a move to stop the company from collecting funds from Singapore-based investors, when it had done so against Binance.


Maybank economist Chua Hak Bin said that while the loss to Temasek is painful, it represents less than 0.1 per cent of Temasek’s total assets, which are estimated to be about S$403 billion in 2022.

Mr Chia agreed, saying that such losses are part and parcel of investing and that it is common for institutional investors such as Temasek to diversify their portfolios to include all sorts of asset classes.

“As an investor you have to take risks to get returns, and historically Temasek has been able to generate good returns,” he said.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.